by Writer's Edge Staff
If a writer conference can be considered a success based on the amount of polished manuscripts attendees took home, as well as the high number of pitched novels requested by agents, then the San Francisco Write to Market was a raving success. In truth, there are no better indicators. Writers in attendance were a new generation of up and comers, many of whom, based on the quality of their writing, can be relied on to make a dent in book circles before too long.
All the above aside, and following an extensive pre-conference review of every writer's novel, or work-in-progress, important commonalities emerged--none of which were a surprise given the purpose of the writer conference. First of all, many projects were missing a vital antagonist, or any kind of antagonistic force. Second, titles and opening hooks were in need of a boost. Third, in many cases, the set-up and back story were present, but the core of the story appeared vague or nonexistent. Fourth, a considerable number of genre projects were insufficiently high concept to be competitive in this current marketplace. Finally, a good portion of the writers, regardless of overall experience, lacked the knowledge necessary to properly pitch the project to agents.
The point of the San Francisco Write to Market conference is to serve writers in all stages of becoming, whatever their needs may be, and one expects attendees at such an event to need some guidance, but what became apparent was that most of the attendees, through no fault of their own (95% of these writers were bright, energetic, and very serious), and despite being at the game for many months or even years, were in need of more fundamentals. But why? Given the plethora of writing magazines, blogs, workshops, etc., it was somewhat of a revelation.
Could it be that writer magazines and writer groups (and perhaps even MFA programs) are actually failing as a whole to provide aspiring authors with the most critical and basic facts they need to approach the creation of the novel?
It appears that way ... It's impossible to believe that so many intelligent and tenacious individuals at the Write to Market were generally unable or unwilling to seek out the knowledge necessary to make their considerable labors more fruitful. They were eager for knowledge and more than willing to learn what they needed to be successful. As a matter of fact, at the conclusion of the event, the ten or so agents present sincerely asked to see dozens of projects.
If a writer conference can be considered a success based on the amount of polished manuscripts attendees took home, as well as the high number of pitched novels requested by agents, then the San Francisco Write to Market was a raving success. In truth, there are no better indicators. Writers in attendance were a new generation of up and comers, many of whom, based on the quality of their writing, can be relied on to make a dent in book circles before too long.All the above aside, and following an extensive pre-conference review of every writer's novel, or work-in-progress, important commonalities emerged--none of which were a surprise given the purpose of the writer conference. First of all, many projects were missing a vital antagonist, or any kind of antagonistic force. Second, titles and opening hooks were in need of a boost. Third, in many cases, the set-up and back story were present, but the core of the story appeared vague or nonexistent. Fourth, a considerable number of genre projects were insufficiently high concept to be competitive in this current marketplace. Finally, a good portion of the writers, regardless of overall experience, lacked the knowledge necessary to properly pitch the project to agents.
The point of the San Francisco Write to Market conference is to serve writers in all stages of becoming, whatever their needs may be, and one expects attendees at such an event to need some guidance, but what became apparent was that most of the attendees, through no fault of their own (95% of these writers were bright, energetic, and very serious), and despite being at the game for many months or even years, were in need of more fundamentals. But why? Given the plethora of writing magazines, blogs, workshops, etc., it was somewhat of a revelation.
Could it be that writer magazines and writer groups (and perhaps even MFA programs) are actually failing as a whole to provide aspiring authors with the most critical and basic facts they need to approach the creation of the novel?
It appears that way ... It's impossible to believe that so many intelligent and tenacious individuals at the Write to Market were generally unable or unwilling to seek out the knowledge necessary to make their considerable labors more fruitful. They were eager for knowledge and more than willing to learn what they needed to be successful. As a matter of fact, at the conclusion of the event, the ten or so agents present sincerely asked to see dozens of projects.
______
![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=78b5591b-1318-490a-9dcb-5cefac2620f5)

![Reblog this post [with Zemanta]](http://img.zemanta.com/reblog_e.png?x-id=2fa0e69a-07eb-418d-8204-f19ed3b29dfe)